- https://www.varagesale.com/
- http://m.varagesale.com/NDvd/ESGLxYSDaB
- https://news.varagesale.com/meet-tami-chief-mom-at-varagesale/
- https://www.varagesale.com/l-get-the-app
- https://geo.itunes.apple.com/us/app/varagesale/id622859960?mt=8
- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.codified.hipyard
- http://contact.varagesale.com
- http://help.varagesale.com
- http://www.verticalscope.com/copyright.html?site=varagesale.com
- https://news.varagesale.com/
- https://www.facebook.com/Varagesale
- https://www.youtube.com/user/varagesale
- https://twitter.com/varagesale
- https://www.instagram.com/varagesale
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...
Comments