- https://www.insidesport.com.au/retro
- http://forum.insidesport.com.au
- https://www.mymagazines.com.au/magazine/golf-australia?utm_source=insidesport&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=house%20ads
- https://twitter.com/GolfAustMag
- https://www.facebook.com/golfaustralia
- https://www.instagram.com/golfaustraliamagazine
- http://forum.insidesport.com.au/Inside-Sport/Golf
- https://www.nextmedia.com.au/
- https://www.mymagazines.com.au/category/sports-outdoors?utm_source=insidesport&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=house%20ads
- https://www.nextmedia.com.au/privacy-policy/
- https://www.nextmedia.com.au/terms-conditions/
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...

Comments