- https://www.kletsen.nl
- https://aurora.anchor.chat/click.php?link_id=13
- https://aurora.anchor.chat/click.php?link_id=18
- https://anchor.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
- https://aurora.anchor.chat/click.php?link_id=253
- https://aurora.anchor.chat/click.php?link_id=254
- https://itunes.apple.com/nl/app/chatplaza/id1277654207
- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=chat.anchor.chatplaza
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...
Comments