- https://www.dynacom.com:1443/service/authentication/default.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fservice%2fmembers%2fdefault.aspx%3fculturename%3dfr-ca&culturename=fr-ca
- https://www.dynacom.com/a-propos/contactez-nous/index.html
- https://www.dynacom.com/tarifs/index.html
- https://www.dynacom.com/solutions/developpement-sur-mesure/
- https://www.dynacom.com/solutions/commerce-electronique/
- https://www.dynacom.com/solutions/point-de-ventes-pos/
- https://www.dynacom.com/solutions/solutions-par-industrie/
- https://www.dynacom.com/a-propos/contactez-nous/
- https://www.dynacom.com/tarifs/
- https://www.facebook.com/DynacomTechnologies/
- https://www.linkedin.com/company/dynacom-technologies/
- https://www.dynacom.com/service/support/LiveHelp.aspx?culturename=fr-ca
- http://www.teamviewer.com/link/?url=505374&id=1493512378
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...
Comments