- https://petflow.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/categories/200256174-Common-Questions
- https://petflow.zendesk.com/
- http://petflow.theresumator.com/apply
- http://blog.petflow.com/
- https://petflow.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
- https://petflow.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/200261004-Returns-Policy
- http://www.trustpilot.com/review/petflow.com
- http://careers.petflow.com
- http://blog.petflow.com
- https://www.facebook.com/petflow
- https://www.instagram.com/petflow
- https://www.pinterest.com/petflow
- https://www.twitter.com/petflow
- https://www.bbb.org/new-york-city/business-reviews/pet-supplies-and-foods-retail/pet-flow-llc-in-new-york-ny-116169/#bbbonlineclick
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...
Comments