- https://shastaemail.com
- https://my.shasta.com
- https://www.shasta.com/design/website-design/
- https://www.shasta.com/marketing/search-engine-optimization/
- https://www.shasta.com/hosting/website-hosting/
- https://www.shasta.com/email/email-hosting/
- https://www.shasta.com/internet/get-connected/
- https://www.shasta.com/support/shasta.com-support/
- https://shastabeam.com
- http://shastabeam.com
- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Shastacom/119158084785680
- https://www.facebook.com/Shastacom/
- https://shasta.com
- http://www.shasta.com
After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction: 00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...
Comments