Skip to main content

Vulcan DoS Vs Akamai

In the past I had to do several DoS security audits, with múltiples types of tests and intensities. Sometimes several DDoS protections were present like Akamai for static content, and Arbor for absorb part of the bandwith.

One consideration for the DoS/DDoS tools is that probably it will loss the control of the attacker host, and the tool at least has to be able to stop automatically with a timeout, but can also implement remote response checks.

In order to size the minimum mbps needed to flood a service or to retard the response in a significant amount of time, the attacker hosts need a bandwith limiter, that increments in a logarithmic way up to a limit agreed with the customer/isp/cpd.

There are DoS tools that doesn't have this timeouts, and bandwith limit based on mbps, for that reason I have to implement a LD_PRELOAD based solution: bwcontrol

Although there are several good tools for stressing web servers and web aplications like apache ab, or other common tools used for pen-testing, but I also wrote a fast web flooder in c++ named wflood.

As expected the most effective for taking down the web server are the slow-loris, slow-read and derivatives, few host were needed to DoS an online banking. 
Remote attacks to database and highly dynamic web content were discarded, that could be impacted for sure.

I did another tool in c++ for crafting massive tcp/udp/ip malformed packets, that impacted sometimes on load balancers and firewalls, it was vulcan, it freezed even the firewall client software.

The funny thing was that the common attacks against Akamai hosts, where ineffective, and so does the slow-loris family of attacks, because are common, and the Akamai nginx webservers are well tunned. But when tried vulcan, few intensity was enough to crash Akamai hosts.

Another attack vector for static sites was trying to locate the IP of the customer instead of Akamai, if the customer doesn't use the Akamai Shadow service, it's possible to perform a HTTP Host header scan, and direct the attack to that host bypassing Akamai.

And what about Arbor protection? is good for reducing the flood but there are other kind of attacks, and this protection use to be disabled by default and in local holidays can be a mess.

More info


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reversing C++ String And QString

After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object: At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string. If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++: We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with  rust binaries gets crazy for a while. Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more  low-level than rust. The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction:         00400c4b 48 b8 68        MOV        RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568 And basic_string generates the string, in the case of  rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_str...

The Base Blockchain Airdrop: Hidden Opportunities You Don’t Want to Miss!

The Base blockchain, supported by Coinbase, is making waves in the crypto space with its surging Total Value Locked (TVL) and potential airdrop opportunities. In this article, we'll dive deep into Base's ecosystem, its key protocols, and strategies for maximizing potential rewards. We'll also explore SynFutures, a standout perpetual protocol, and other exciting opportunities that could set the stage for a lucrative airdrop. Base Blockchain: A Rising Star Current Status Base has climbed to the sixth position among blockchains in terms of TVL, surpassing even Arbitrum, the long-time leader in Ethereum Layer 2 solutions. With $4 billion+ in TVL , Base's rapid growth is drawing attention from the crypto community. Why the Excitement Around a Potential Airdrop? Coinbase Backing: As a leading exchange, Coinbase's involvement ensures credibility and innovation. Changing Regulations: With evolving regulatory clarity, there's renewed optimism for potential rewards lik...

5 Costly Crypto Investing Mistakes to Avoid in Choppy Markets

Crypto markets can be a wild ride, with exhilarating highs often followed by gut-wrenching lows. Many investors see massive gains during bullish trends only to watch them evaporate in sideways or bearish phases. The key to preserving your portfolio lies in avoiding common pitfalls that trap even seasoned traders. This article dives into five critical mistakes crypto investors make in choppy markets and offers actionable strategies to steer clear of them. Whether you're a beginner or a veteran, these insights will help you navigate the volatile crypto landscape with discipline and confidence. The Perils of Slow Decision-Making In crypto, hesitation can be costly. Opportunities often arise from compelling setups — whether it's a promising chart pattern, a groundbreaking technological innovation, or strong on-chain signals like whale wallet activity. However, in dull or sideways markets, investors often become lethargic, missing the window to act. By the time social media buzz ign...